E5 · HVAC Equipment and Components
Foundation lesson · 30 minute study sessionUse affinity laws only for comparable operating states
A modest speed change can produce a large power change. The relationship depends on the machine geometry, fluid density, efficiency and system curve.
By the end of this lesson
- Apply fixed-diameter speed affinity laws.
- Distinguish head or pressure scaling from power scaling.
- Recognize curve, efficiency, NPSH and compressor limitations.
Fixed geometry and speed change
For the same fan or centrifugal pump at comparable points with fixed diameter and the same fluid density, flow scales with speed, developed pressure or head with speed squared, and shaft power approximately with speed cubed when efficiency remains comparable. Speed must be a ratio in matching units. Use only with the stated fixed geometry and comparable efficiency.
Check the actual system
A friction-dominated system often follows a quadratic loss curve, making speed scaling useful. A substantial static-head term changes how the operating point moves. Filter loading, dampers, valves and changed efficiency can make a simple cube-law estimate inadequate. Use the supplied machine and system curves when they govern.
Do not extend the law blindly
Centrifugal pump laws do not replace a compressor thermodynamic calculation. Compressors require attention to pressure ratio, suction state, efficiency and the stated process. Pump cavitation requires a separate NPSH check: available NPSH must exceed required NPSH with any stated margin, using absolute suction pressure and the fluid vapor pressure.
A decision map for this lesson
Affinity laws describe comparable points
Use the speed relationship for an estimate, then establish the installed operating point and equipment limits.
| Condition or question | Governing decision | Error to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Speed changes at fixed diameter and density | At comparable points, , , and with the stated efficiency assumption. | Using one linear multiplier for flow, head and power. |
| Static head is material | Intersect the changed machine curve with the actual system curve. | Assuming installed flow must scale directly with speed. |
| Input power is requested | Separate hydraulic/refrigerant work, shaft input and motor input efficiencies. | Applying motor efficiency to a quantity already stated as electrical input. |
| A pump, fan or compressor is selected | Check NPSH, stable operating region or gas-flow reference as applicable to the machine. | Treating an affinity estimate as a complete equipment-selection check. |
On a narrow screen, scroll across the table to compare the decision and the error.
Relationships and their limits
Fixed-diameter speed laws
Comparable points; same fluid density and geometry; shaft-power estimate assumes comparable efficiency.
Fan pressure and density
For comparable fan states with fixed geometry. Density effects must not be omitted when they change.
| Symbol | Meaning | Units or basis |
|---|---|---|
| Flow on stated basis | gpm or cfm | |
| Pump head | ft of liquid | |
| Shaft power | hp | |
| Rotational speed | rpm | |
| Fluid density | lb/ft³ | |
| Speed ratio | dimensionless | |
| Fan pressure rise | matching pressure units |
One decision, fully worked
Apply the method.
A centrifugal fan delivers 10,000 cfm at 900 rpm, develops 2.0 in. w.g. and uses 8.0 shaft hp. Diameter and air density are unchanged. At comparable points assume unchanged efficiency. Estimate flow, pressure and shaft power at 1,080 rpm.
- Calculate the speed ratio, 1.20.
- Multiply flow by the ratio.
- Multiply pressure by the ratio squared.
- Multiply shaft power by the ratio cubed.
The comparable-point estimate is 12,000 cfm, 2.88 in. w.g. and about 13.8 shaft hp.
Independent checkA 20% speed increase produces about a 73% power increase under these assumptions, not a 20% increase.
Specialist extension
Distinguish isentropic from mechanical compressor efficiency
Isentropic compressor efficiency compares the ideal isentropic enthalpy rise with the actual refrigerant enthalpy rise at the same inlet and discharge pressure. Mechanical or motor losses belong to additional input boundaries if supplied. Obtain the ideal discharge state from inlet entropy and discharge pressure on the stated refrigerant property source rather than substituting an arbitrary outlet temperature.
A new applied case
Inlet enthalpy is 110 Btu/lb and supplied isentropic discharge enthalpy is 130. Isentropic efficiency is 0.75 and refrigerant flow is 400 lb/h. Ignore other losses.
Decision. Actual discharge enthalpy is 136.667 and refrigerant work is about 10,666.7 Btu/h.
Cross-check. An efficiency below one makes actual work greater than the ideal 8,000 Btu/h for this specified comparison.
Unit basis. h is Btu/lb on one datum; mass rate is lb/h; isentropic efficiency is dimensionless; this is refrigerant work.
NCEES PE Mechanical Reference Handbook v2.1; see the module reference path.
Open targeted practice in the study studio →Transfer the method
Catch the common errors
- Applying the speed ratio once to power.
- Using electrical input power interchangeably with shaft power when efficiency changes.
- Using affinity scaling as a substitute for a static-head system-curve or NPSH check.
Handbook navigation drill
Find it, then explain it.
Search: Pump Affinity Laws
Locate the pump speed-law relationships and the fan section. Find the NPSH discussion in pump characteristics.
Check your navigation
You can identify the exponent and assumptions for each quantity before using the law.
Reference path: §3.7.4–3.7.6, pp. 255–259; §4.5.3, p. 292; §9.3.8, pp. 516–523. These are printed handbook page numbers; section names and search terms remain the primary navigation method. See technical review status.
Theory sources
- NCEES handbook v2.1, §§3.7.4–3.7.6, 4.5.3 and 9.3.8.
- Grondzik and Kwok, Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings, 12th ed., ch. 12.
Worked examples and lesson prose are original ReasonSpan™ material. Obtain authorized publications separately; this preview does not reproduce the supplied books or handbook.