Decision Lab · E7 · Device constraints and net purchased energy
Recover energy without crossing the prohibited air path
Select a recovery mechanism from the actual air-quality and layout constraints, then ask whether its added electrical load outweighs the benefit.
By the end of this workshop
- Choose a method that respects the supplied conditions.
- Explain how a changed condition affects the decision.
- Identify a physical or procedural cross-check and an applicability limit.
- Record the assumption you would verify next time.
Start with the complete model
Givens and assumptions
- Supply and exhaust ducts are 60 ft apart. This original exercise prohibits any transfer path between their air streams; only sensible recovery is required.
- The supplied run-around option uses separated closed-fluid coils with no air connection. The proposed heat-pipe option requires adjacent ducts. The proposed wheel has no acceptable carryover verification for this exhaust.
- The run-around option avoids 22,000 Btu/h of downstream cooling and adds 2.0 kW total purchased fan/pump input. Extra equipment heat is outside that cooling boundary. Displaced cooling COP is 3.0. Use 3,412 Btu/h per kW.
| Proposed device | Supplied constraint | Selection consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel | Required carryover evidence absent | Cannot approve from the provided evidence |
| Heat pipe | This proposed unit requires adjacent ducts | Does not fit the stated separated layout |
| Run-around coils | Separated fluid circuit; no air connection in the stated model | Evaluate duty and electrical penalty |
Study calculator, scratch notepad and whiteboard
Sketch a control volume or air path with a mouse, pen or touch. Ink stays in this page session and clears on reload. Use the response and reflection fields as a keyboard alternative. Sign in before starting and save a reflection to retain your reasoning.
1 · Choose the method
Which supplied proposal can proceed to the net-energy check under the stated separated-duct and prohibited-air-path constraints?
2 · Change the condition
Predict before you inspect the calculation.
Total extra purchased fan/pump power rises to 2.4 kW; the avoided thermal duty and cooling boundary stay fixed.
- Avoided cooling = 22,000 Btu/h, cooling COP = 3.0, extra purchased input = 2.4 kW, all extra equipment heat outside the downstream cooling boundary, conversion 3,412 Btu/h per kW.
Check the first decision to open the changed-condition response.
Reference navigation drill
Search concept: energy recovery, effectiveness
Mark the thermal and electrical boundaries separately. Identify the facts you would need to compare another proposed device.
Where this model stops
Specified original proposal constraints. Real devices require verification of leakage, carryover, fluid integrity, frost control and applicability. Do not infer every wheel is prohibited or every heat pipe requires adjacent ducts.
The PE Mechanical: HVAC and Refrigeration examination uses the NCEES PE Mechanical Reference Handbook. These source links provide study context; they are not additional exam-day references.
- DOE · energy recovery ventilation fundamentals ↗
- NCEES · current PE Mechanical: HVAC and Refrigeration specification ↗
Found an unclear condition or calculation? Include workshop recovery-device-and-penalty and the step in your comment.
Share private feedback →